Three Key Data Privacy Tips for Associations

With the recent one-year anniversary of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), now is a good time for associations to consider key data privacy tips.  Data privacy is a key area of compliance that is receiving increasing attention from courts, legislatures, and customers.  Data privacy is distinct from data security and concerns how you collect, use, and share individuals’ data.  Most importantly, good data privacy is increasingly perceived as an integral part of good business ethics by customers and partners.  Here are three tips for considering how data privacy can affect your organization:

  • (1) Update Your Privacy Policy:  Customers, courts, and regulatory agencies now expect companies to provide clear and accurate privacy policies.  Having incorrect or incomplete policies can lead to unhappy members and even legal action.  When updating your association's policy, remember the simple mantra:  “Say what you do, do what you say.” 
  • (2) Determine your risk under the GDPR:  The GDPR is an EU regulation that became effective on May 25, 2018.  It carries hefty fines and can apply to U.S. associations if the association has an establishment in the EU or offers goods and services to individuals in the EU.  If the GDPR applies to your association, noncompliance can be expensive, as EU individuals can lodge complaints against your association with EU data protection agencies.  Read "GDPR Basics for U.S.-based Organizations" here.
  • (3) Learn Your Data Privacy Obligations Under Existing and Upcoming U.S. Laws:  As data privacy becomes a focus for state governments, Congress, and the Federal Trade Commission, it is important for associations to relearn their data privacy obligations and review their practices.  Over the past year, numerous states such as New York, Texas, and California have passed or introduced bills imposing GDPR-like data privacy obligations on U.S. entities.

And remember, data privacy is becoming an increasingly important part of customer service.  Members, customers, and even former employees of members are paying much more attention to how their data is being collected, used, and shared.  For more information on the data privacy, please contact Oliver Krischik at 202.342.5266 or okrischik@gkglaw.com

Affirmation Letter No Longer Required for DC Tax-Exempt Renewal Applications

On January 1, 2019, DC’s new tax-exempt renewal rules went into effect.  Under these new rules, non-profits who have received tax-exempt status from DC are required to reapply for tax exemption every five (5) years.  Many DC non-profits have already received a “Notice of Upcoming Exemption Expiration” from the DC Office of Tax and Revenue (the “OTR”) informing them of this requirement. In order to renew its tax-exempt status, a non-profit must log into its MyTax.DC.com account and complete the online FR-164 tax exemption application.  If a non-profit does not renew its tax-exempt exemption it will be reclassified as a fully taxable entity in DC.  These new rules affect any non-profit doing business in the District.

One of the most vexing parts of this new renewal process has been obtaining an affirmation letter from the IRS.  In order to renew its tax exemption, a non-profit that had a determination letter issued over four (4) years ago was required to obtain an affirmation letter from the IRS confirming its tax-exempt status. 

However, earlier this month it was announced that DC would no longer require IRS affirmation letters.  Instead, the OTR will confirm a non-profit’s IRS tax-exempt status by performing a Publication 78 data search on the IRS website.  While the FR-164 exemption application will still have a section where a non-profit can submit its affirmation letter, it is no longer a required field in the application.  This change should streamline the renewal process and make it significantly easier for non-profits to complete the renewal application.

If you have any questions regarding the new DC tax-exempt renewal rules or the FR-164 tax exemption application, please contact Katie Meyer at kmeyer@gkglaw.com.

Surface Transportation Board Oversight Hearing on Demurrage and Accessorial Charges

Update:  GKG Law's Tom Wilcox will testify on behalf of the National Grain and Feed Association at the Surface Transportation Board's oversight hearing on railroad demurrage and accessorial charges on May 22 in Washington, DC.

The Surface Transportation Board (STB) has scheduled a public oversight hearing on May 22, 2019, to receive information from railroads, shippers, receivers, third-party logistics providers, and other parties about their recent experiences with demurrage and accessorial charges.  The STB’s announcement stated that the hearing arises from “recent concerns by users of the freight rail network and other stakeholders about changes to demurrage and accessorial tariffs being implemented by various Class I carriers, and follows related letter inquiries to Class I carriers, including requests for information on quarterly revenue from demurrage and accessorial charges for 2018 and 2019.”  Matters of concern include reciprocity, commercial fairness, the impact of operational changes on such charges, capacity issues, and effects on network fluidity.

GKG Law’s Tom Wilcox recently addressed this issue at the National Coal Transportation Association’s Spring Conference on April 2, 2019.  Tom advised conference attendees that non-railroad parties have several options in addition to attending and listening to the hearing, which include providing in-person testimony, submitting written comments, or both.

The full Decision Information from the STB can be read here.

Detailed hearing schedule here

Deadlines are as follows:

  • If you would like to testify, you must file with the STB preferable as soon as possible, but no later than April 24.
  • If you want to participate in person.  Written testimony must be received by May 8.
  • If you simply want to only submit comments, they must be received by May 8.

For more information on this issue and hearing, please contact Tom Wilcox at twilcox@gkglaw.com.

GKG Law’s Ed Greenberg Speaks at GEODIS USA Seminar on Regulatory Issues for US Exporters

GKG Law's Ed Greenberg was a key speaker at a GEODIS USA seminar on May 22, 2019, in Philadelphia, PA.  This seminar focused on regulatory issues for US exporters.  More information on GKG Law's Transportation, Trade & Logistics Practice Group can be found here

Are VGMs Back?

Two years ago, on behalf of the National Customs Brokers and Forwarders Association of America (the NCBFAA), GKG Law worked with the US Coast Guard (USCG) to challenge the attempts of the ocean carriers that would have required NVOCCs and shippers to provide a Verified Gross Mass (VGM) Certificate to the carriers in advance of tendering cargo. As you may recall, the VGM issue arose due to efforts by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), after several vessels capsized for unknown reasons, to adopt a method that would provide greater certainty about the weight of containers being loaded on vessels.

After a number of meetings on the topic, the IMO issued what are called VGM Guidelines which were adopted by most trading nations. The VGM Guidelines take the position that it is the shipper’s responsibility to verify the weight of loaded containers and require any party tendering cargo to provide a VGM certificate that has been obtained from a certified scale in advance of the tender. However, we contended that turning what had been Guidelines into mandated regulations amounted to an inappropriate attempt by the vessel operators to transfer significant operational burdens and liability to NVOCCs and shippers. Moreover, as US ports already had certified scales and were fully capable of weighing containers before or during the loading process, this would essentially be a redundant process that drove up costs unnecessarily.

Despite significant lobbying efforts in the United States, the carriers were not successful in getting the USCG – – which has jurisdiction over maritime safety issues – – to adopt the VGM Guidelines. Instead, the USCG was persuaded that the carrier’s attempts to make this a requirement in the US, regardless of what other nations decided, were unnecessary and inappropriate.

Consequently, the USCG declined to make the VGM Guidelines a requirement and the carriers’ attempts to circumvent this decision by putting VGM rules in their tariffs were met with disfavor by the FMC.

Nonetheless, we have heard recently indicating that some carriers may be requiring NVOCCs to provide VGM Certificates as a condition to accepting cargo and is seeking information on the topic. If your company is being required to provide the VGM Certificates to the vessel operators, we would be interested in knowing about it and suggest that you provide us with the names of the carriers that have imposed this requirement.

If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact Ed Greenberg at 202.342.5277 or egreenberg@gkglaw.com.

GKG Law’s Oliver Krischik and Kristine Little Recognized as "Rising Stars" by Super Lawyers

The 2019 edition of Super Lawyers Magazine, published by Thomson Reuters, has named two GKG Law attorneys to its list of Rising Stars. Selection to Super Lawyers is based on a multiphase process that includes a nationwide survey of lawyers, independent research and evaluation of candidates, and peer reviews by practice area.

2019 Rising Stars:

Oliver KrischikTop Rated Administrative Law Attorney in Washington, DC

Kristine LittleTop Rated Transportation & Maritime Attorney in Washington, DC

Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters business, is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement.  Super Lawyers lists are published nationwide in Super Lawyers magazines and in leading city and regional magazines and newspapers across the country.

Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved.